In the introduction we referred to the supposed relation between confinement
and extended excitations of the Yang-Mills field. Recently, an even deeper
and more fundamental relation between branes and Yang-Mills fields has
been conjectured in the framework of -theory [13]. Non-perturbative
formulations of string theory require the introduction of higher dimensional
solitonic objects satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions [14].
Dirichlet-branes are formally described by non-commuting matrix coordinates.
Thus, non-perturbative string theory, or -theory, is conveniently
written in terms of matrix dynamical variables. The corresponding low energy,
effective, supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory is derived through an appropriate
compactification procedure of the original matrix model [11],
[15].
In this section we are going to follow a similar path, but in the opposite
direction: we shall start from a gauge theory in four dimensional
spacetime and build a matrix model. Our final purpose is to show that the
spectrum of such a QCD matrix model contains dynamical membrane type
objects. We thus start from the Yang-Mills action
(5)
defined in terms of the Lagrangian density
(6)
The covariant derivative is defined as usual,
(7)
but the Yang-Mills Lagrangian
is written
in the first order formulation: thus
are independent vector and
tensor fields respectively5 valued
in the Lie algebra defined by the commutation relations
The integration
volume will be specified later on.
The form (6) is appropriate for an Hamiltonian
formulation of the action, as it is required by the quenching approximation
that we shall apply in the next section.
Starting from the Lagrangian density we can, as usual,
introduce the canonical momentum and Hamiltonian
(8)
(9)
and rewrite (6), in terms of phase space variables, as:
(10)
Accordingly, the phase space action reads
(11)
(12)
Let us remark that
enters linearly in the canonical form of the action (12)
and plays the role of Lagrange multiplier enforcing the (non-Abelian) Gauss
Law:
(13)
Thus, solving the classical field equation for
is equivalent as
requiring
to be covariantly divergence free in vacuum. Thus,
inserting the solution of the Gauss constraint (13),
the action for
becomes