 
 
 
 
 
   
Recently, within a newly proposed spacetime approach to dualities
[1], an interesting new result emerged for the dual theory of
an Abelian gauge field in two dimensions[2]. The novelty of that
two dimensional model stems from the fact that there is no known dual
version of it within the conventional  -duality approach [3].
The root of the problem is that a gauge field in two
dimensions corresponds to the limiting value
-duality approach [3].
The root of the problem is that a gauge field in two
dimensions corresponds to the limiting value   , and the usual
dualization procedure is not
applicable because the corresponding Bianchi identities are
undefined5.
As a matter of fact, according to the conventional method, the dual
theory of a
, and the usual
dualization procedure is not
applicable because the corresponding Bianchi identities are
undefined5.
As a matter of fact, according to the conventional method, the dual
theory of a  -form  involves a
-form  involves a  field, and this correspondence leads
to the constraint
 field, and this correspondence leads
to the constraint  .
Nevertheless, one wonders if  there is a way to extend the
.
Nevertheless, one wonders if  there is a way to extend the
 -duality approach to the case
-duality approach to the case  , even though the dual field theory
of the starting matter field is generally undefined. To be sure, in the absence
of interactions, the dual theory of a gauge field strength of maximum
rank
, even though the dual field theory
of the starting matter field is generally undefined. To be sure, in the absence
of interactions, the dual theory of a gauge field strength of maximum
rank  corresponds to a  background field which is constant over the
spacetime manifold. In this narrow sense, one may speak of ``constant-tensor
duality'' for the free theory in the limiting case. However, in a flat
spacetime, such a constant can be gauged away on account of
translational invariance, so that the resulting free theory is essentially
empty6. It
seems clear, therefore, that the extension of the
 corresponds to a  background field which is constant over the
spacetime manifold. In this narrow sense, one may speak of ``constant-tensor
duality'' for the free theory in the limiting case. However, in a flat
spacetime, such a constant can be gauged away on account of
translational invariance, so that the resulting free theory is essentially
empty6. It
seems clear, therefore, that the extension of the  -duality
approach must go beyond the case of a free theory in the limiting case.
Why would these limiting cases be of any interest? Apart from the
recognized importance of dualities in connection with the theory of
extended objects[6], it turns out that such limiting
theories have been shown to be of some phenomenological relevance in
relation to the problem  of confinement[7], [8] and
glueball formation [9]. The question arises, then, as to what happens
in the case of an interacting theory, for instance in the simplest case in
which a coupling to an external  current is present.
-duality
approach must go beyond the case of a free theory in the limiting case.
Why would these limiting cases be of any interest? Apart from the
recognized importance of dualities in connection with the theory of
extended objects[6], it turns out that such limiting
theories have been shown to be of some phenomenological relevance in
relation to the problem  of confinement[7], [8] and
glueball formation [9]. The question arises, then, as to what happens
in the case of an interacting theory, for instance in the simplest case in
which a coupling to an external  current is present.
 
 
 
 
